Home » News » TFT and AMOLED screens differ from one another

TFT and AMOLED screens differ from one another

Views: 263     Author: Wendy     Publish Time: 2023-06-16      Origin: Site


facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button
TFT and AMOLED screens differ from one another

The original TFT displays of mobile phones are now being replaced with AMOLED panels in an increasing number of devices today, and many phone buyers look for AMOLED when making a purchase.What precisely is an AMOLED screen, what are its advantages, and how does it differ from a TFT screen in terms of this mobile phone screen parameter?

Describe AMOLED

The next generation of display technology is known as AMOLED (full name: Active Matrix/Organic Light Emitting Diode). Companies like Samsung Electronics, Samsung SDI, and LG Philips place a high value on this new display technology. Currently, Samsung SDI and AUO focus on small and medium-sized devices in addition to Samsung Electronics and LG Philips, who concentrate on the development of large-size AMOLED products. AMOLED mobile phone displays are currently found on numerous Samsung smartphones, including the Samsung 8300.Examples include the NOKIA N86, which was introduced in the first quarter of 2009, and the NOKIA N85, both of which feature AMOLED, demonstrating the current major manufacturers' emphasis on the technology. In terms of picture quality, performance, and cost, AMOLED is more advantageous than TFTLCD. This is a further justification for the fact that despite the challenges of surpassing the yield rate, several worldwide manufacturers continue to work on AMOLED technology. AMOLED boasts a better reaction time, more contrast, and a broader viewing angle when it comes to display performance. AMOLED is naturally superior to TFTLCD in several areas. AMOLED is also capable of outperforming TFT since it self-illuminates and doesn't require a backlight. The fact that AMOLED does not require a backlight and hence can save money on that component, which makes up 34% of the cost of a TFTLCD, is an even more significant benefit. In particular, AMOLED's power-saving capabilities make it ideal for mobile phones. There is still space for future technologies to substantially reduce the power consumption of AMOLED panels, which is now only around 60% of that of TFTLCD. Since the defect rate is undoubtedly the main issue with AMOLED, its price is 50% more than that of TFTLCD, which is undoubtedly a barrier to consumers' desire to adopt a large number of AMOLED products. The yield rate for Qijing is currently still being modified. Don't take on too many orders at once while you're still learning.

The distinction between an AMOLED and TFT display is as follows

In fact, you can virtually perceive the drawbacks of tft from the benefits of AMOLED that have been outlined above. Let me quickly explain how they vary from one another. Though its technical indicators are not as good as those of AMOLED, TFT technology is more established and frequently utilized. It is also more stable than AMOLED. AMOLED generates light on its own in theory, whereas TFT depends on a backlight. AMOLED is lighter, slimmer, does not require a backlight, has a large viewing angle, great brightness, quick reaction, and uses less electricity. However, as it is a new product, the failure rate is now a drawback.




Building 1, Taihong Industrial Park, West Daya Bay, Huizhou, Guangdong, China
  +86 0752 5556588
Copyrights 2023 Huizhou Kelai Electronics Co., Ltd.